banner

PM World Journal
ISSN: 2330-4480  |  Vol. XV, Issue II  |  February 2026
Commentary
4IR · AI · Blockchain

Future Technologies and Project Control

Abstract

The Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) presents significant technological disruption, forcing project management and control professionals to embrace new digital tools. In this article the author explores how technologies, particularly Blockchain and Artificial Intelligence (AI), are fundamentally transforming project delivery, monitoring, and control processes, especially within the construction sector. These technologies address persistent industry challenges, such as low productivity and lack of trust, by enhancing data integration, transparency, accuracy, and operational efficiencies. Using case studies and conceptual frameworks, this article illustrates how AI leverages standard structures (i.e. Work Breakdown Structure, etc.) to automate tasks and provide predictive insights, while Blockchain ensures secure, transparent transaction record keeping via mechanisms like Smart Contracts. However, realising these benefits requires systemic transformation, a focus on cultural change, and maintaining the critical 'human in the loop' for successful decision-making.

Introduction

The modern project environment operates within conditions characterised as VUCA:

V
Volatile
U
Uncertain
C
Complex
A
Ambiguous

Navigating this reality demands not just incremental improvement but fundamental organisational and technological transformation. We are firmly in the era of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR), which is characterised by rapid, continuous, and momentous technological changes where the potential for disruption is and will be ever present.

In industries such as construction, this technological necessity is vital for tackling long-standing productivity issues. The integration, accuracy, transparency, speed of data transfer, and trustworthiness of project data/information are essential for sound decision-making and effective project control. Traditionally, the industry has faced challenges due to a lack of data and software tool integration, poor management of the design process, and disrupted workflows.

The current response involves leveraging advanced technologies, primarily blockchain and Artificial Intelligence (AI), alongside existing digital techniques such as building information modelling (BIM) and the Internet of Things (IoT). Blockchain introduces mechanisms such as automated workflows, transparency, and legally binding smart contracts, creating a catalyst for change, especially in supply chain management and payment security. Concurrently, AI leverages machine learning (ML), natural language processing (NLP), and predictive analytics to revolutionise project control processes, enabling project controllers to be proactive rather than reactive.

The objective of this article is to explore the intersection of these technologies and project control, detailing the underpinning theory, presenting practical examples, and discussing the necessary systemic and cultural changes required for successful adoption and maximised benefit.

Brief Theory

The successful delivery of projects within complex, inter-organisational systems relies heavily on achieving a collaborative environment supported by technology, a genuine transformation. This transformation requires establishing fundamental prerequisites, primarily the use of common standards and the successful integration of data and software systems. The core of this system based approach is understanding how to interlink standard project management structures, especially the Work Breakdown Structure (WBS) and Cost Breakdown Structure (CBS), and how these structures roll up data into meaningful information for decision-making.

Blockchain Technology: The Foundation of Trust and Transparency

Blockchain technology moves beyond its widely known application in digital currency (like Bitcoin) and is considered by some to be as important as the internet in its potential impact. In the built environment, blockchain is seen as enabling a network of trust established through mass collaboration and 'clever code' rather than relying on powerful human intermediaries.

The pervasive use of blockchain in construction supports critical functions such as:

1 Smart Contracts Payment Mechanisms
2 Retentions Protection
3 Digital Identity and Intellectual Property Rights
4 Supply Chain Management (often linked to BIM)
5 Project Monitoring and Control Processes
A key benefit of implementing smart contracts and automated workflows is the ability to drive operational efficiency by removing intermediaries and administrative effort in record-keeping and transaction reconciliation. McKinsey, in 2018, noted that approximately 70% of the value derived from blockchain would come from cost reduction. Furthermore, the inherent transparency and immutability of blockchain ensures the history of information can be traced back, reducing corruption and preventing fraud and manipulation.

Artificial Intelligence: Enhancing Predictive Control

Artificial Intelligence (AI) refers to the study of 'intelligent agents', autonomous non-human entities capable of taking in information from their environment and acting upon it to succeed in defined goals. For an intelligent agent to function, it must have mastered Machine Learning (ML) and aspects of predictive data analytics. ML involves specific steps to manage data, including identifying, structuring, cleaning, enriching, validating usefulness, and documenting the analysis.

AI significantly enhances project control by:

  • Integrating and leveraging standard project management structures: AI increases the utility of WBS, OBS, CBS, and others (e.g. RBS, RiBS) by automating processes and extracting insights for optimisation.
  • Improving efficiency and accuracy: AI automates repetitive tasks and reduces human error in forecasts and tracking.
  • Increasing proactivity and scalability: AI anticipates issues across interdependent structures and supports the management of complex, multi-faceted projects.

Crucially, the successful deployment of powerful AI systems requires the ongoing intervention of the ‘human in the loop’. This human oversight is necessary to check, approve, and release actions recommended by an AI agent, particularly in sensitive areas like the critical path of a schedule

Some Examples

To illustrate the drivers for adopting future technologies and the framework for integration, three key areas of evidence are presented as figures.

The Construction Industry Productivity Gap and Savings Opportunity

The adoption of new technology is driven by the urgent need to address the productivity lag evident in the construction sector. As illustrated in the productivity chart shown below in Figure 1, construction lags significantly behind the manufacturing sectors and the average global economy.

Figure 1: Construction Consortium Business Case – Productivity Gap
SOURCE: ONS (UK), OECD, World Bank, McKinsey, Helium, Construction Smart Contracts Committee
$1.5–3T
Productivity savings opportunity
2015–2030
33%
Target reduction in
construction costs (UK Gov)
50%
Target reduction in time
from inception to completion

The Technologies Available to Support Project Monitoring and Control

The bubbles in Figure 2 below give an indication of the current technologies that are used and could be used in the majority of the project monitoring and control processes and for the delivery of a project, programme or portfolio.

Figure 2: Technologies available for project monitoring and control

In various articles and presentations/podcasts, the author has given a number of examples of how these technologies can support project monitoring and control.

Integrated Programme & Project Management System

Before new technologies like blockchain and AI can be effectively leveraged, an organisation must establish an integrated system structure that manages the flow of data. The concept of an Integrated Programme & Project Management System (Figure 3) demonstrates how various software tools interface to provide comprehensive project control.

Figure 3: Integrated Programme & Project Management System

This integrated system requires the proper structuring of data to facilitate efficient delivery and transfer of information from the project level up to the programme and portfolio levels. This structure, linking software tools such as Primavera P6 with SAP, Unifier (for cost and contract management), and CostOS (for estimating), is fundamental to developing the 'truly open and transparent environment' required for collaborative work and minimising intrusive monitoring activities. This holistic view is necessary for preparing systems for further advancements, such as blockchain prerequisites and AI / Machine Learning (ML) for analytics.

Supporting the Organisation

To support the organisation, the PMO or the relevant department will need to generate a KM (Knowledge Management) environment through the CoE (Centre of Excellence). Figure 4 below demonstrates a KM environment that was set up by the author in a major Utility organisation (for further details, see Antoniadis, 2026).

Figure 4: The PMO Knowledge Management CoE (Antoniadis, 2026)

The PMO KM CoE is fundamental for any type of organisation. It could cover what is presented in Figure 4 as well as other areas (depending on the requirements).

Conceptual Thinking of Key Considerations for a Wider AI Application Across Project Control

AI is poised to enhance project control by integrating advanced technologies like ML, NLP, computer vision, and predictive analytics across core project control functions. Figure 5 presents the 'requirements', in the form of a mind map, which will need to be considered to deliver project monitoring and control. The 'requirements' depicted in the figure is an attempt by the author to demonstrate the wide requirements and these have most probably been considered by the various software companies that are currently delivering such AI software tools.

Figure 5: AI and the Project Control Processes – A conceptual set of key considerations

The deployment of AI focuses on three key process areas:

1. Planning and Scheduling

AI optimises schedules and predicts delays through various mechanisms.

  • 1.1Data Analysis: AI uses historical project data (including task durations, dependencies, and external factors like weather forecasts) to create realistic schedules.
  • 1.2Machine Learning: Algorithms identify patterns in past projects to predict optimal task order and durations.
  • 1.3Simulation: Tools run Monte Carlo simulations to test multiple scenarios and recommend the most efficient one.
  • 1.4Examples of tools include ALICE Pro, ALICE Core, Primavera P6, and nPlan with AI plugins. AI also supports Automated WBS Creation using NLP to analyse documents and draft the structure.
2. Cost Management

AI improves cost estimation, tracks budgets, and prevents overruns.

  • 2.1Predictive Modelling: AI analyses historical cost data, market trends, and project scope to accurately forecast expenses.
  • 2.2Real-Time Monitoring: AI integrates with financial systems (like SAP or Oracle NetSuite) to track spending against baselines and alert managers to anomalies.
  • 2.3Natural Language Processing (NLP): AI scans contracts or invoices to flag discrepancies or unexpected costs, potentially integrating with Smart Contract technology.
3. Risk Management

AI proactively identifies, prioritises, and mitigates risks.

  • 3.1Pattern Recognition and Risk Scoring: AI scans external data (news, supply chain updates) and project plans to detect potential risks (e.g., resource shortages). ML algorithms assign probability and impact scores.
  • 3.2Decision Trees: AI suggests mitigation strategies based on successful outcomes from similar past projects.
  • 3.3Example tools include IBM Watson for risk analysis and nPlan's QSRA module, which combines risk information with Augmented Reality (AR) or XYZ Reality to visualise progress and mitigate risks.

Closing Remarks

The future of project control is inextricably linked to technological evolution, driven by the rapid pace of the 4IR and the need to overcome entrenched productivity and trust issues in the built environment. Technologies such as blockchain and AI offer profound solutions.

Blockchain provides the necessary transparency and automated workflow, embodied through smart contracts or other processes, that acts as a catalyst for change, particularly in commercial processes and supply chain management. Isolated use of blockchain will have no impact; its power lies in providing transparency and automated workflow, complementing digital storage of crucial documents via Common Data Environments (CDE) and BIM Level 2.

AI enhances project control by bringing efficiency, accuracy, proactivity, and scalability to traditional structures like the WBS and CBS, automating tasks ranging from schedule optimisation to real-time budget tracking and predictive risk scoring.

However, technological integration alone is insufficient. The organisational environment must be adapted to foster collaborative working, establish required behaviours, implement cultural initiatives, and generally re-orient teams away from procedural issues towards coordination and innovation. Furthermore, there must be acceptance that accurate data needs to be received across functions, and the use of 'grey IT' (unconnected software like spreadsheets) must be minimised as it isolates data and builds doubt.

Ultimately, regardless of the sophistication of AI or blockchain, the human element remains vital. Project professionals must shift their skill set from merely technical knowledge to strategic roles: they must lead, synthesise, and guide. The future of the project control professional depends on combining technical expertise with exceptional human skills, embracing change, and being resilient enough to test, fail, adjust, and repeat new approaches.

Reflective Questions

To effectively transition project control professionals and systems into the 4IR era, several reflective questions must be addressed:

How will Project Control accommodate the future trends driven by technologies like AI and blockchain?
Given that AI begins to take over monitoring, estimating, scheduling, and risk analysis, what core strategic role remains for the project management professional?
How can organisations foster the necessary cultural and behavioural changes needed to support a truly open and transparent collaborative digital environment?
What measures must be taken to ensure that the 'human in the loop' functions effectively, checking and validating the complex outputs provided by intelligent AI agents?
Considering that data sharing is an international challenge, how will global supply chains on big projects be managed effectively, especially if central mandates to enforce adherence to new processes and contracts do not exist?

Sources

Antoniadis, D. (2018). Demystifying Project Control. Amazon.
Antoniadis, D. (2020). Socio-organo Complexity, Project Schedule Performance, and Underdamped Transient Motion. International Journal of Chaos, Control, Modelling and Simulations (IJCCMS) 9(4).
Antoniadis, D. (2026). PMO Memory Framework for Knowledge Management and Visualisation, advisory, PM World Journal, Vol. XV, Issue I, January. https://pmworldlibrary.net/…
APM (2019 & 2020). APM Report Projecting the Future – 4IR & PM4.0. www.apm.org.uk
ARUP (2017). Blockchain Technology. How the Inventions behind Bitcoin are Enabling a Network of Trust for the Built Environment. ARUP Consultancy.
Beck, R. (2018). Beyond bitcoin: The rise of blockchain. Computer, 51(2), 54–58.
Beck, R., & Müller-Bloch, C. (2017). Blockchain as radical innovation: A framework for engaging with distributed ledgers as incumbent organization. 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
Beck, R., Müller-Bloch, C. & King, J.L. (2018). Governance in the Blockchain Economy: A Framework and Research Agenda. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 19(10), 1020–1034.
Brookes, N., Lattuf Flores, L., Dyer, R., Stewart, I., Wang, K., & Dacre, N. (2020). Project data analytics: the state of the art and science [APM Research].
Christidis, K., & Devetsikiotis, M. (2016). Blockchains and smart contracts for the internet of things. IEEE Access, 4, 2292–2303.
Flyvbjerg, B (2021). Make Mega Projects More Modular. Harvard Business Review, November–December 2021.
Gledson, B.J. and Greenwood, D.J. (2017). The adoption of 4D BIM in the UK construction industry: An Innovation Diffusion approach. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(6), 950–967.
Kaplan, A., Haenlein, M. (2019). Digital transformation and disruption: On big data, blockchain, artificial intelligence, and other things. ScienceDirect (Article in Press).
Khodakarami, V., Fenton, N. E., & Neil, M. (2007). Project scheduling: improved approach to incorporate uncertainty using Bayesian networks. Project Management Journal, 38(2), 39–49.
Li, J., Greenwood, D. and Kassem, M. (2019). Blockchain in built environment and construction industry: a systematic review, conceptual models and practical use cases. Automation in Construction, 102, pp. 288–307.
McKinsey & Co. (2018). Blockchain beyond the hype: What is the strategic business value. www.mckinsey.com
PMI (2023). Generative AI Overview for Project Managers – Resources.
Rogers, E. M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
Tapscott, D., & Tapscott, A. (2016). The impact of the blockchain goes beyond financial services. Harvard Business Review. https://hbr.org
UK Gov (2018). Construction Sector Deal policy paper. www.gov.uk
DA
Dr. Dimitris N. Antoniadis
London, UK

Dr Dimitris N. Antoniadis PhD MSc BEng(1st) CEng FAPM FCMI MIMechE, based in UK, has 35+ years' experience in Programme and Project Management positions, having covered project phases from concept to handover and operation / maintenance.

He is currently Director in the Programme, Project Management and PMO with DANTON PROGM, technical advisor to Novacept and has set up the BSc in Project Control that is currently delivered by the partnership between London Metropolitan College and the University of West London.

He has held Senior Management posts in major utilities, infrastructure and construction organisations delivering programmes of works ranging from £250M to £3.2Bn. As Head of Programme Management Office (PMO) he has set up and run the departments within challenging partnering environments, setting up all the processes from governance to reporting. He has also led / co-led major business transformation programmes for Client organisations in UK and abroad, integrating project management software tools with ERP systems.

He is the author of the book Demystifying Project Control; contributed chapters in books on complexity, leadership and other project management topics and has written a number of journal and conference papers. He has been a guest speaker at UK Universities as well as International conferences on various project management topics.

He was awarded the PhD, from Loughborough University, UK, on the subject of Managing Complexity in Project Teams, where he developed a framework for managing the effects of complexity on projects.

How to cite: Antoniadis, D. (2026). Future technologies and project control, commentary, PM World Journal, Vol. XV, Issue II, February.